Obligatory. Sometimes I think the greatest testament to Michael Jackson's musical genius is that his work could be covered by bunch of talentless goons calling themselves "
Alien Ant Farm" and it could come out kind of, you know, maybe not "good," but not the end of the world either.
Then again, maybe not that's not the greatest testament since it doesn't begin to convey how incredible the combination of that song with the dance moves in something like this can be:
7 comments:
calling him out vs. stating obvious fact...either way Cowherd is teh suck.
then the next day he didn't even apologize to the team or give them any props for their amazing victory. if there is a more smug and less likeable person on sportstalk radio than Colin Cowherd then i have no clue who it is. he makes Jim Rome seem reasonable and sensitive in comparison.
i think i just listen to him to give myself things to be angry about.
also on the Draft i have but 1 question:
was that the worst NBA draft EVER or the worst draft possible?
i think i already hate Ricky Rubio.
As a Tuscaloosa resident, I can confidently say that data is from 2002, and the Holt plant closed shortly thereafter. This reduce the pollution 92%
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20090625/NEWS/906249917
Re: letting scholarship players go if they don't measure up.
My immediate reaction was that this is unfair to players, But after reading some of the comments at the UK site, one poster brought up a very good point. If the school is going to be held to the letter of the contract (scholarship), then so should the student (athlete).
That would mean guys can't leave school early for the NFL draft if they took a four year contract (scholarship). It cuts both ways.
But the risk factor seems so much worse for the student (athlete) because many of these guys are never going to play pro ball. Thus the degree is just compensation for their "pain and suffering." The school can always get another guy, presumably.
The way I see it, KFP, the annual scholarship renewal is fine--doing a four-year deal just doesn't make sense in age where players turn pro as often as they do and coaches are raked over the coals for keeping the miscreants around (and, of course, losing). It seems an acceptable compromise to me--the players get to leave when they want, the coaches don't have to keep discipline cases around for four years.
But there's so, so much greater cost to the player rather than the school in a non-renewal--for the reasons you cite and others--that it makes sense for the terms of the "contract" to be "just keep your nose clean and work hard and you'll get your four years." Calipari screwing around with those terms is just another way of taking college athletics closer to professionalism, and it sucks.
If the practice does become widespread, or even if just the big schools adopt it, it may well have a talent levelling effect. A kid might want to go to USC but knows the competition level for his position is stacked. Why risk no playing time and loss of scholarship when he can go to Mississippi State and be sure to at least play enough to get his diploma.
this hurt like losing to Tennessee. How do you give up a 2-0 lead at half?
Post a Comment